Submission Requirements
1). Language
English is the official language of the conference; the paper should be written and presented only in English.
3). Paper Length Each full paper should be no less than 4 full pages in two columns, including all figures, tables, and references. When it exceeds 6 pages, extra page will be charged at 50 USD / per page.
4). All submitted articles should report original, previously unpublished research results, experimental or theoretical. Articles submitted to the conference should meet these criteria and must not be under consideration for publication elsewhere. We firmly believe that ethical conduct is the most essential virtual of any academic. Hence any act of plagiarism is a totally unacceptable academic misconduct and cannot be tolerated. If an author is found to commit an act of plagiarism, the following acts of sanction will be taken:·Reject the article submitted or delete the article from the final publications.·Report the authors violation to his/her supervisor(s) and affiliated institution(s)·Report the authors violation to the appropriate overseeing office of academic ethics and research funding agency.·Reserve the right to publish the authors name(s), the title of the article, the name(s) of the affiliated institution and the details of misconduct, etc. of the plagiarist”.
Submission Process
1). Download the Paper Template for formatting your full paper.
2). Submit your full paper or abstract directly to EasyChair Submission System.
3). The conference secretary will assign a Paper ID to the submission from ic-fess@outlook.com within three working days. To ensure receipt of all correspondence from the conference, please add ic-fess@outlook.com as acceptable emails to receive. If you have any question, please feel free to contact conference secretary (ic-fess@outlook.com).
Peer Review Policy
1). Submission
Authors submit full papers (4–6 pages) or abstracts adhering to the conference’s template via the online system. Papers must be original, unpublished, and not under review elsewhere.
2). Initial Review
Submissions undergo a pre-screening by the organizing committee to check for compliance with scope, formatting, and ethical standards. Papers that fail this stage are rejected without further review.
3). Double-Blind Peer Review
Papers are assigned to 2–3 expert reviewers from the technical program committee or external scholars with expertise in bioinformatics, biomedicine, or statistics.
4). Evaluation Criteria
Reviewers assess papers based on:Originality: Novelty of methods, algorithms, or applications.Technical Rigor: Soundness of methodology, data analysis, and statistical approaches.Relevance: Alignment with the conference’s themesClarity: Quality of writing, logical flow, and presentation of results.Significance: Potential impact on the field or practical implications.
5). Decision-Making and Feedback
Based on reviewer recommendations, the program committee (PC) chairs decide to:Accept the paper as-is.Request Revisions (minor or major) for resubmission.Reject the paper if it fails to meet standards.
6). Transparency
Reviewers provide constructive comments to help authors improve their work. Rejected papers receive detailed explanations for the decision.
7). Final Publication and Presentation
Accepted papers are published in conference proceedings and at least one author must register and present the paper at the conference (either orally or as a poster). Virtual presentations may be allowed under specific circumstances.